Stadler & Waldorf (1-5) vs. Burke City Giants (4-2)
You would think the Texans are a fantasy powerhouse by the number of them in this game (Schaub and Slaton for Michael, Johnson and benched Walter for me). They are playing the Lions, which usually means big numbers. Unfortunately mine will be cancelled out by his, and my other big guns are playing tough defenses.
Burke City by 9
CH Croakies (3-3) vs. Lassard Blows Harris (3-3)
This should be a low-scoring event, with a lot of guys playing good defenses and a few starters on byes. Hard to pick a winner, but in light of my concession earlier this week, I gotta go with Papkin.
LBH by 3
Chestpubes & Ballfro (3-3) vs. Wyld Stallyns (3-3)
So apparently Tony Romo is playing, but I suspect he won't be full strength, and Felix Jones is still not playing. Also I see big things for DeYoung this week. Not sure why.
Stallyns by 10
The Leadfarmers (3-3) vs. Hamster Now Guinea Pig (5-1)
Hallers collide. If there were a god, the collision would destroy them both. But there isn't, so we'll be stuck with a 6-1 'Tosis team.Hamster by 14
Matt Ryan Loves Dogs (3-3) vs. Mephistopheles (3-3)
Mephistopheles is as hot as his domain right now, currently on a 3-game win streak. With MRLD starting Chad Pennington and Roy Williams, who probably knows 4-5 plays at this point, I suspect it'll continue.
Mephistopheles by 6
I don't know what the fuck is going on with the spacing right now. Every time I hit return it advances like 5 lines.
Woody's Warriors (2-4) vs. Tri Steeg Area (3-3)
Normally when I point out a bunch of starters for one team, with the point being "can you believe this guy's starting these jokers?", those jokers end up having huge days. But it's not gonna stop me from pointing out that Woody's starting Ahmad Bradshaw, Selvin Young, and Antwaan Randle El.
Tri Steeg by 15
Last week: 4-2
Overall: 24-12
If you're into drugs, you can stare at stuff like this for hours:
But afterwards you gotta take your glasses off and stretch it out a little bit. Am I right, babe?
4 comments:
hows that parity now....what a crock of shit....
were you expecting all the 3-3 teams to stay at 3-3? because the thing is that they're playing each other, so some of them have to go to 4-3, while others go to 3-4. and we now have 9 teams at one of those two records, rather than 8 at 3-3, so actually a higher degree of parity. if i were being mean and nasty and engaging in such antics, i'd say that you're a fucking idiot, who maybe isn't even clear on what "parity" means. but i'm done with all that, so i'll just assume that this was all some sort of misunderstanding.
my point is far too long to explain.... call me if you really want to know what i was referring to..
sovic you just wouldn't understand. only men of sam papkin's intelligence could comprehend the crock of shit that parity is in this bush league.
Post a Comment